Hosted Microsoft Dynamics – SPLA verses Subscription Licence – what’s the difference?

SPLA-vs-Subscription-Licensing

So first thing is to say is that Microsoft is a big organisation and like most large corporates, one division does not always work perfectly with another. Decisions are made within each division which are illogical when viewed from the outside and only understanding of the internal politics and the history, explains why.

The first way that Microsoft offered Dynamics NAV and CRM on a rental model was via SPLA (Service Provider Licence Agreement). When the whole cloud bandwagon started rolling in 2007 the then CEO of Microsoft decided that every single one of their products would now be available under this model and that included Dynamics. SPLA is run via a set of people responsible for boosting recurrent ‘cloud’ revenue with Microsoft and is nothing to do with the Dynamics team.

Dynamics within Microsoft have no direct control and have only recently had sight of SPLA customers and revenue (so don’t ask for deal/discount on SPLA). As a partner we report SPLA licence via a Microsoft LAR, distributor to the rest of us, with our usage of every other Microsoft product like Office, Windows Server, SQL and System Centre for instance.

With recurrent revenue becoming more popular the Dynamics team realised that they needed more control and so they introduced subscription licences in 2013. Yes it has the same model of monthly cost as SPLA but orders are placed by us direct with Microsoft and they do offer promotions and incentives (the recent 50%+20% if you are hosted on Azure and also on Office 365 is an example).

The other major difference is that you have to pay for customisation objects with subscription, but you get all you can eat in the user licence with SPLA. Heavily customised systems are better off on SPLA for this reason, those packs of ten tables and hundreds of pages, reports and code units etc. can quickly add up.

Both licences allow downward as well as upward changes in the number of users, so are similar in terms of flexibility.

Both are popular, although for us SPLA is still the biggest but I believe that’s historic. Most new customers are going onto subscription mainly due to the fact that its 70% off till June 2017. This obviously needs to be periodically reviewed as at the end of that subscription deal, SPLA may be the better option.

Remember the licence enables exactly the same software so it purely a matter of which ones cost you the least commercially. Do the comparison with your partner and pick the best option for you.

Author: James Crowter

I’m passionate about how businesses can improve their efficiency by getting process optimal more of the time. For the last twenty five years I’ve worked to help organisations of all sizes and types implement the ERP & CRM software that typically they decide they need when things are going wrong. I’ve seen that work unbelievably well and enabled those organisations to rapidly grow but I’ve also had some hard projects over that time where it’s felt more like warfare at times. Since 1996 (and version 1.01) I’ve been working with a small Danish product called Navision that’s now become Microsoft’s Dynamics NAV and I’ve also been using and consulting around Microsoft CRM since 2005. As managing Director of one of the longest established first Navision and now Microsoft Dynamics partners I’ve been involved in the complete history including numerous product councils and system design reviews. It’s my privilege to know many of the key Microsoft executives and product designers and have insight into both where the products are now and their future direction. So colleagues & clients have asked me to start this blog to share some of the insight that both this knowledge (obviously where not restricted by NDA’s or client confidentiality) and experience can help. Specifically I want to concentrate not on the specifics of how (there are some great blogs already for that) but why. If any user helps their business make better decisions or consultant can give better advice then that will be objective achieved. I founded Technology Management in 1992 and have led from the front ever since. Helping clients use technology to grow their business is my passion through explaining technology in terms that everyone can understand. My interest in computing began at the age of eight, long before my school had the equipment to cope. Throughout school and university I developed software commercially. I hold many IT certifications, such as Microsoft Dynamics NAV (for over 17 years), Microsoft Dynamics CRM (for over 10 years), as well as Microsoft Windows Server, Exchange and SQL. In October 2015, I was awarded the title of Most Valuable Professional (MVP), a title given to a select few individuals (31 currently) across the world specifically for Dynamics NAV. After years of working with a range of distribution and manufacturing software for hundreds of organisations, I focus on understanding the business requirements of an organisation, what it will take to deliver the systems required to maximise their potential. Follow me online via my other social channels: - Twitter: @jamescrowter - LinkedIn: linkedin.com/in/jamescrowter Or email me directly at james[.]crowter[@]tecman.co.uk.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *